skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Shenoy, Chetan"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. PurposeTo develop a physics‐guided deep learning (PG‐DL) reconstruction strategy based on a signal intensity informed multi‐coil (SIIM) encoding operator for highly‐accelerated simultaneous multislice (SMS) myocardial perfusion cardiac MRI (CMR). MethodsFirst‐pass perfusion CMR acquires highly‐accelerated images with dynamically varying signal intensity/SNR following the administration of a gadolinium‐based contrast agent. Thus, using PG‐DL reconstruction with a conventional multi‐coil encoding operator leads to analogous signal intensity variations across different time‐frames at the network output, creating difficulties in generalization for varying SNR levels. We propose to use a SIIM encoding operator to capture the signal intensity/SNR variations across time‐frames in a reformulated encoding operator. This leads to a more uniform/flat contrast at the output of the PG‐DL network, facilitating generalizability across time‐frames. PG‐DL reconstruction with the proposed SIIM encoding operator is compared to PG‐DL with conventional encoding operator, split slice‐GRAPPA, locally low‐rank (LLR) regularized reconstruction, low‐rank plus sparse (L + S) reconstruction, and regularized ROCK‐SPIRiT. ResultsResults on highly accelerated free‐breathing first pass myocardial perfusion CMR at three‐fold SMS and four‐fold in‐plane acceleration show that the proposed method improves upon the reconstruction methods use for comparison. Substantial noise reduction is achieved compared to split slice‐GRAPPA, and aliasing artifacts reduction compared to LLR regularized reconstruction, L + S reconstruction and PG‐DL with conventional encoding. Furthermore, a qualitative reader study indicated that proposed method outperformed all methods. ConclusionPG‐DL reconstruction with the proposed SIIM encoding operator improves generalization across different time‐frames /SNRs in highly accelerated perfusion CMR. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
  3. PurposeTo develop and evaluate a cardiac phase‐resolved myocardial T1mapping sequence. MethodsThe proposed method for temporally resolved parametric assessment of Z‐magnetization recovery (TOPAZ) is based on contiguous fast low‐angle shot imaging readout after magnetization inversion from the pulsed steady state. Thereby, segmented k‐space data are acquired over multiple heartbeats, before reaching steady state. This results in sampling of the inversion‐recovery curve for each heart phase at multiple points separated by an R‐R interval. Joint T1andestimation is performed for reconstruction of cardiac phase‐resolved T1andmaps. Sequence parameters are optimized using numerical simulations. Phantom and in vivo imaging are performed to compare the proposed sequence to a spin‐echo reference and saturation pulse prepared heart rate–independent inversion‐recovery (SAPPHIRE) T1mapping sequence in terms of accuracy and precision. ResultsIn phantom, TOPAZ T1values with integratedcorrection are in good agreement with spin‐echo T1values (normalized root mean square error = 4.2%) and consistent across the cardiac cycle (coefficient of variation = 1.4 ± 0.78%) and different heart rates (coefficient of variation = 1.2 ± 1.9%). In vivo imaging shows no significant difference in TOPAZ T1times between the cardiac phases (analysis of variance:P = 0.14, coefficient of variation = 3.2 ± 0.8%), but underestimation compared with SAPPHIRE (T1time ± precision: 1431 ± 56 ms versus 1569 ± 65 ms). In vivo precision is comparable to SAPPHIRE T1mapping until middiastole (P > 0.07), but deteriorates in the later phases. ConclusionsThe proposed sequence allows cardiac phase‐resolved T1mapping with integratedassessment at a temporal resolution of 40 ms. Magn Reson Med 79:2087–2100, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 
    more » « less